Selected
work.

Six engagements across concepts and unit counts. What the operation looked like, and what we did about it.

Fine DiningMulti-UnitFood Cost

Michelin-Recognized Fine Dining Group

Bay Area · Multi-location · 90-day engagement

The Challenge

The group had built a Michelin-recognized brand with deep customer loyalty. But behind the scenes, the operation was bleeding money. Food cost was running at 26.2% well above the 22-24% target for their concept, and trending the wrong direction.

  • Food cost running 26.2% (target: 22-24%)
  • No standardized portion control across multiple locations
  • Supplier relationships transactional, not strategic, paying market or above on most items
  • High spoilage on specialty produce (cilantro, onions, specialty vegetables)
  • Inconsistent food quality (some nights tandoor was perfect, some nights variable)

The complexity was real: tandoor operations, specialty spice blends, seasonal produce, and labor-intensive prep. Standardization would be hard. But the math demanded action, every 1% of food cost was $260K/year.

The Approach

Part 1: Purchasing Intelligence. Audited the top 30 items by spend. The group was overpaying on 8 of the top 15 items by an average of 4.2% approximately $284K/year in unnecessary spend. Renegotiated with existing suppliers (didn't switch, loyalty matters) using market data as leverage. Within 3 weeks, locked in better pricing on most items.

Part 2: Portion Standardization. Created visual portion guides for every menu item, photo plus weight. Trained all 20+ kitchen staff. Implemented weekly spot-checks: random plates weighed against standard. Initial variance was ±1.2 oz on tandoori chicken; reduced to ±0.4 oz in 4 weeks.

Part 3: Waste Elimination. Moved produce delivery from 2x/week to 4x/week (reduced spoilage from 8% to 3% of produce). Standardized trimming procedures. Analyzed returned dishes and found seasoning inconsistencies, implemented spice blend standards.

Fast Casual5 UnitsLabor

5-Unit Fresh Casual Concept

West Coast · 5 locations · 12-week engagement

The Challenge

The group had 5 locations with very different demand patterns, but everyone was scheduling the same way: by feel. Managers built schedules based on "what worked last week" instead of demand data. The result was overstaffing on slow days, understaffing on busy days, and chronic overtime.

  • Payroll at 32.5% (industry target for fresh casual: 28-30%)
  • 18 hours/week of overtime across 5 units
  • Staff turnover at 65% replacing 26 people per year
  • Schedules published 3 days out (not enough lead time for staff)
  • No demand forecasting or per-location optimization

The Approach

We pulled 12 weeks of POS data by location and found that Locations had distinctly different patterns. Downtown peaked Thursday-Friday; suburban locations had more even traffic; one had heavy weekend volume. Built location-specific demand forecasts and staffing matrices.

Scheduling was tied directly to forecasted covers. Schedules locked 10 days in advance. Manager bonuses were tied to hitting labor targets within ±2%. The result wasn't fewer hours, it was hours redeployed to where they actually mattered. Slow shifts got cut. Busy shifts got proper staffing. Overtime evaporated.

FranchiseMulti-UnitScaling

Multi-Unit Franchisee

Casual dining · 3 to 7 units over 18 months

The Challenge

The franchisee had capital and ambition but was stuck. Three units running at 4% profit. No systems. Couldn't open a 4th because they didn't have the operational confidence that a 4th unit wouldn't sink the operation.

  • Profitability at 4% (system average: 8%)
  • 72% staff turnover
  • No visibility into per-location P&L
  • Each unit run differently (no standardization)
  • Franchisor support generic, not specific to their challenges

The Approach

We benchmarked their best unit (Unit 1, 7% profit) and documented everything that manager was doing. Created standardized playbooks: opening, closing, scheduling, ordering, training. Deployed those playbooks across Units 2 and 3 with onsite coaching.

By month 6, all three units were on system. That's when expansion became possible. Each new unit (4, 5, 6, 7) ramped to profit faster than the last because the playbook was proven.

Fine DiningTurnaroundSingle Unit

Fine Dining Restaurant Turnaround

Fine dining · Single unit · 90-day turnaround

The Challenge

The food was excellent. The operation was not. Inconsistent opening procedures meant some nights service started smoothly, others were chaos. Head chef ordered ad hoc, no PO system. Staff turnover at 45%. Quality varied night to night despite excellent ingredients.

  • Profitability stuck at 6% (target: 12-15% for fine dining)
  • Food cost at 31%, waste at 5.2%
  • Annual turnover 45% high even for fine dining
  • No standardized opening/closing procedures
  • Service quality inconsistent night to night

The Approach

Brought systems to fine dining. Implemented 90-minute opening protocol (mise en place verification, ambiance check, briefing). Created PO system head chef could work within (initial pushback, then full embrace, it freed creativity from logistics). Reduced waste from 5.2% to 3.1% through better ordering and trim training.

The biggest unlock: with stable systems, training became reproducible. New staff onboarded faster. Turnover dropped because expectations were clear and the kitchen ran like a kitchen, not a circus.

QSR12 UnitsSystem-Wide

Quick Service Restaurant Group

Quick service · 12 units · System-wide

The Challenge

The owner suspected operational issues but couldn't pinpoint them. Average profitability of 6% masked huge variance: Unit 7 (airport location) hit 11%, Unit 12 (new) was losing money. The owner was running 12 units like 12 different businesses.

  • Average profitability: 6% (industry target: 10-12%)
  • Wide variance across units (-1% to 11%)
  • Food cost at 32%, labor at 26%
  • No system-wide playbook
  • New unit ramps were slow and unpredictable

The Approach

Used Unit 7 (best performer at 11% profit) as the benchmark. Documented everything: ordering discipline, portion control, scheduling rigor, weekly P&L review process, manager development practices. Created the "Unit 7 Playbook."

Deployed across all 12 units with onsite coaching from Unit 7's manager. Worst performers (Units 3, 12) got 2-week intensive coaching engagements. Within 12 months, every unit was running on system.

Franchise System45+ UnitsFranchisor

Franchise System Optimization

Franchise system · 45+ units

The Challenge

Some franchisees were doing $1.2M/year; others were stuck at $500K despite the same brand and concept. Average profitability was 5.2%. Franchisees were frustrated. Brand reputation suffered from inconsistent quality. The franchisor needed to intervene without overstepping franchisee autonomy.

The Approach

Diagnostic audit across all 45 units. Identified four performance tiers. Met with top quartile franchisees and asked: "What are you doing differently?" Common themes: opening/closing procedures, data-driven scheduling, ordering discipline, weekly metrics tracking.

Built a full Operations Playbook from these insights. Piloted with 8 franchisees from second/third quartile. Results validated the approach. Then rolled out system-wide with regional coaches and peer learning groups.

Talk to Eric.

Reach out to talk about fit.